05w11:2 More on the Canada Council Posted March 14th, 2005 by timothy. 0 Comments Good Reads Mailing List | 2005 week 11 number 2 (More on the Canada Council) This article by Soloman Fagan came to my attention last night, dealing with the Canada Council controversy, and it made me angrier than I’ve been since this whole thing started last November. I wrote a little rant, which I posted on /commentary, since I figured that none of the readers on the list in the U.S. and elsewhere shouldn’t need to read about it in this space. But for those readers than, this is what it’s about: The Canada Council is like the United States’ N.E.A. In my circle, I hear that artists outside of Canada are jealous that we get all these grants, but that’s not true. The Canada Council only supports 8% of those that apply, which means that there are rumours of favouritism and of cliques, and it creates the myth of prestige, so that 3 years after you graduate from artschool, you too can submit your name into this lottery for $3000. If the jury thinks your work is ‘great’, you get your taxable cheque and get to inspire envy and jealousy amongst your peers. Now, the Canada Council wants to change all this. They want to start giving out greater funds to the more established cliques, people who have somehow already been able to manage without their support. Artists who have benefited either from past funding or believe in the prestige-factor, are complaining and writing petitions, seemingly wanting to maintain the system as it is, while fearing future vindictiveness from the Council for opposing its suggested course of action. Oh Canada! – Timothy ——————————————————————— Art heist | Soloman Fagan http://www.nowtoronto.com/issues/2005-03-10/news_story2.php “Remember, the Council’s funding has not increased over the years to keep up with inflation ? but how does cutting developing artists’ funding remedy this? One board member told me ‘sustainability’ was the buzzword in discussions. But the two grants that individual artists can receive in four years could hardly sustain anyone at the old rates, let alone the proposed chopped ones. […] According to Balkan, the Council wants to focus on ‘breakthrough’ artists like Janet Cardiff. While I agree that Cardiff is doing excellent work and deserves support, in the context of the proposed changes her selection raises some disturbing questions. Will we let an international system of biennales determine Canadian cultural value rather than Canadians themselves? Is an artistic criterion being established that equates technological progress with cultural value? […] Apparently, one of the rationales for the drastic reallocation of funding to ‘senior’ artists is the high cost of producing pieces like Cardiff’s. This is art on the scale promoted by the international system in which countries send their representatives for collective mega-exhibitions. Here, full-room ‘installations’ of live nude female models or live tropical butterflies, Ã la Vanessa Beecroft, Matthew Barney or Damien Hirst, can easily cost tens of thousands of dollars to produce. How can Canadian artists, with a current meagre $34,000 in the senior category, ‘compete’ with those who can mount works of such magnitude? While gigantism and expensive technologies are all the rage at large exhibits, it’s unclear how promoting Canada as a ‘global competitor’ in the culture wars will benefit anyone here at home. Perhaps the idea is to garner established artists a higher profile and thereby raise the status of the discipline nationwide, hoping this will ‘trickle down’ to the rest of us. But this is hypothetical. It’s the young and less privileged artists who will suffer the financial brunt of the experiment.” —————————————- http://goodreads.timothycomeau.com To remove or add yourself to this list, go here emailed by Timothy on Monday 14 March 2005 @ 2:04 PM
05w11:1 Genius? Posted March 14th, 2005 by timothy. 0 Comments Good Reads Mailing List | 2005 week 11 number 1 (genius?) ——————————————————————— A genius explains | Richard Johnson http://www.guardian.co.uk/weekend/story/0,,1409903,00.html “Daniel Tammet is an autistic savant. He can perform mind-boggling mathematical calculations at breakneck speeds. But unlike other savants, who can perform similar feats, Tammet can describe how he does it. He speaks seven languages and is even devising his own language. Now scientists are asking whether his exceptional abilities are the key to unlock the secrets of autism.” Idealist and realist; Albert Einstein’s free spirit | Yehuda Elkana http://www.signandsight.com/features/18.html “Finally, it is an important legacy of Einstein to take popular science seriously, and to encourage it being written by excellent writers who know science and reflect upon it. It is well-known that Einstein ascribed his early awareness of problems, and his overview of them, to having read at an early stage the series of popular science books by Aaron Bernstein. These books left a deeper mark on him than is usually acknowledged. We talk much nowadays of the ‘public understanding of science’: often it is presumed by working scientists – even by some of the best of them – that the issue is a popular explanation of technically difficult points like how a nuclear reactor works, or what in technical terms constitutes cloning. But they are wrong: what the public needs is an argument about problem-choices, the place and importance of chosen problems in the context of social needs but also of the map of the state of science, risks and chances.” —————————————- http://goodreads.timothycomeau.com To remove or add yourself to this list, go here emailed by Timothy on Monday 14 March 2005 @ 1:17 PM
05w10:5 Art and the Greater Good Posted March 12th, 2005 by timothy. 0 Comments Good Reads Mailing List | 2005 week 10 number 5 (art and the greater good) I was so taken with Emily’s latest article in C Magazine that I got her and C‘s permission to host it on Goodreads so that I could share it with you – Timothy ——————————————————————— Suffering, Empathy, Art and the Greater Good | Emily Vey Duke http://goodreads.timothycomeau.com/emilyveyduke/ “The problem is that students in art schools, especially at the undergraduate level, are taught the Duchampian paradigm ‘it’s art if you say it is, and saying it’s art when it’s not artful is itself a radical act.’ They’re taught to be suspicious of the beautiful and the interesting, and to follow their quirky whims regardless of the relevance they have to anyone else. They’re also taught, without ever being explicitly told, that as soon as something is art, it’s precious. As a result, art education creates artists who believe that they don’t have to try very hard to make something of immeasurable value. This is no service to the art world. In fact, I think it’s why art is suffering such a crisis of irrelevance to the public at large. The work we’re producing is just not good enough to catch the eye of the non-art-initiated viewer, let alone to hold her attention for long enough to make her care. […] So as always, the question remains: How can we do it better?” —————————————- http://goodreads.timothycomeau.com To remove or add yourself to this list, go here emailed by Timothy on Saturday 12 March 2005 @ 6:47 PM
05w10:4 Darren O'Donnell's 'A Suicide-Site Guide to the City' Posted March 9th, 2005 by timothy. 0 Comments Good Reads Mailing List | 2005 week 10 number 4 (Darren O’Donnell’s ‘A Suicide-Site Guide to the City’) Because this good read is unusual, it needs a bit of an introduction, especially for people outside of Toronto. Darren O’Donnell is a local playwright who’s currently showing his latest work, A Suicide-Site Guide to the City which I reviewed here, and if you read that you’ll see that I really loved the work. Darren performed it last year at the Edinburgh Fringe, during which time he kept a blog (here) and which he’s updated during the Toronto show with a link to a discussion he had with a friend of his named Stef Lenk on her blog. This good read is that discussion, but because it was all very direct and unformatted, I got Stef’s permission to put it up so that I could clean it up for readability. There you will find a link to the original, where you can contribute, continue, and catch up on more recent postings. While for obvious reasons being highly Toronto-centric, this discussion focuses on the problem of what it means to be creative in North America. Are artists being exploited? Are they lackey’s for the status quo? These are questions Darren attempts to raise with his play and attempts to get at in this highly, must-readable discussion. It is frankly one of the most sane and considered things I’ve read in a long time, and insightful in ways that most articles and press fail to be. – Timothy ——————————————————————— Ex-lefties and Suicide-site Guide to the City | Stef Lenk, Darren O’Donnel et al http://goodreads.timothycomeau.com/x-lefties/ “[O’Donnell writes] You : ‘the Us vs. Them scenario is getting us nowhere’. Okay, well, I’ll tell you what. If you can arrange it so I can spend some quality time with one of the world’s 300 billionaires so I can really understand where they’re at then I will consider changing my position. If you can get me into one of their gated communities so we can have a heart-to-heart then I will really open myself to this person. Let me know. I’m busy until the 20th but after that I’m free. […] [Barker writes]There is an enormous potential to have a positive impact on the lives of our community, and our peers (as you identify them) through our artwork, action and example – but it is more the maturity we express as people and citizens, then as artists, that will determine that impact, peer-to-peer. We have some social power, with power comes responsibility, our social power is ours to use or misuse. But artists seem to have a tendency, at least in our subculture, towards self-centredness – perhaps no more, or no less than other kinds of subcultures – but it is the particular ways in which it is expressed in the art scene that makes me a little doubtful of the potential for rallying to goodness around the identification as artists. In any case, I don’t have any real disagreement with the opinions expressed here, just alot of personal frustration with some tendencies in my peer group! I’ll freely admit to that!” —————————————- http://goodreads.timothycomeau.com To remove or add yourself to this list, go here emailed by Timothy on Wednesday 09 March 2005 @ 10:36 PM
05w10:3 The RCMP Thing Posted March 8th, 2005 by timothy. 0 Comments Good Reads Mailing List | 2005 week 10 number 3 (The RCMP thing) ——————————————————————— The RCMP, Grow-ops, and Psychopaths | Timothy Comeau http://tinyurl.com/6p2ll “In the overblown media coverage though, no one has pointed out how unique a country we are where 4 deaths is a ‘national tragedy’. And the grow ops thing – heck even my dad sees the similarities between this type of gunslinger madness and that of the dirty 30’s prohibition. Which also reminds me of Darren O’Donnell’s concerns about the incarceration rates of the United States, which he brings up in his play, A Suicide Site Guide to the City. The United States today puts a greater percentage of its citizens in jails than any other country in the world. A majority of these are drug charges, and most of the people in jail are black. Forget everything you think you know about why that is and consider this…” —————————————- Long links made short by using TinyURL (http://www.tinyurl.com) To remove or add yourself to this list, go here http://goodreads.timothycomeau.com emailed by Timothy on Tuesday 08 March 2005 @ 2:02 PM