08w10:3 Are you really that acquiescent in the United States? Posted March 8th, 2008 by timothy. 1 Comment Goodreads | 2008 week 10 number 3 (Are you really that acquiescent in the United States?) Tucker Carlson unintentionally reveals the role of the American press | Glenn Greenwald http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/03/08/carlson/index.html “Here was Power’s exact quote: “She is a monster, too –- that is off the record –- she is stooping to anything.” But the reporter who was interviewing her, Britain’s Gerri Peev of The Scotsman, printed the comment anyway — as she should have, because Peev had never agreed that any parts of the interview would be “off the record,” and nobody has the right to demand unilaterally, and after the fact, that journalists keep their embarrassing remarks a secret. […] Illustrating that point as vividly as anything I can recall, MSNBC’s Tucker Carlson had Peev on his show last night and angrily criticized her publication of Power’s remarks. Carlson upbraided Peev for her lack of deference to someone as important as Power, and Peev retorted by pointing out exactly what that attitude reflects about Carlson and the American press generally (via LEXIS; h/t Mike Stark): CARLSON: What — she wanted it off the record. Typically, the arrangement is if someone you’re interviewing wants a quote off the record, you give it to them off the record. Why didn’t you do that? PEEV: Are you really that acquiescent in the United States? In the United Kingdom, journalists believe that on or off the record is a principle that’s decided ahead of the interview. If a figure in public life. [empahsis Greenwald]”
Tucker Carlson on the British Media: Samantha Powers and Gerri Peev | The Wardman Wire says: 9 March 2008 at 5:06 am […] Greenwald says that interviewees cannot demand to withdraw remarks on the record after the […]